Skip to content

Telephone loneliness programs produced mixed questionnaire results

Behavioural activation calls improved one loneliness score versus support calls in disadvantaged older adults living alone. Another loneliness questionnaire showed no significant advantage.

By 100HP editorialAbstract-based explanation checked

Based on the published abstract. The full paper may contain additional methods, results and limitations.

The 30-second takeaway

Behavioural activation calls lowered loneliness scores compared with support calls on the UCLA questionnaire at later follow-ups. The De Jong Gierveld questionnaire showed no statistically significant advantage from 4 weeks through 6 months. Mindfulness results also differed between questionnaires, so neither program consistently improved loneliness across both measures in this particular older population.

Keep in mind

The abstract provides no effect sizes or confidence intervals, leaving magnitude and precision unclear. Participants’ specific living circumstances limit how broadly the results can be applied.

THE RESULT, WITH CONTEXT

What researchers found

Lower scores with behavioural activation

UCLA loneliness score

Compared with support calls, scores were significantly lower at 3 and 6 months after intervention.

Age Ageing, 2025 · Original source ↓

Support calls were the comparator

The comparison group also received human contact through befriending and support calls. The study therefore examined whether structured psychological programs added benefit beyond supportive telephone attention.

Mindfulness depended on the measure

Compared with support calls, mindfulness lowered UCLA scores at 3 months but raised De Jong Gierveld scores at 4 weeks and 6 months. It showed no significant advantage for perceived support, stress, psychological well-being, depression or anxiety.

CHECK THE ORIGINAL

The original publication

Six-month outcomes of layperson-delivered, telephone-based behavioural activation and mindfulness interventions on loneliness among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: The HEAL-HOA Dual Randomised Controlled Trial.

Jiang D, Kwok JYY, Yeung DY et al.
Age Ageing · 2025

PubMed ID
40748314
Record checked

AI-assisted research and writing. This explains one selected publication; it is not a complete review of everything known. Our approach.