Skip to content

Virtual-reality studies reported less dialysis needle pain

A review of randomized trials reported less dialysis-access needle pain with virtual reality. Missing comparison details, effect sizes and assessment timing limit interpretation of the reported benefits.

By 100HP editorialAbstract-based explanation checked

Based on the published abstract. The full paper may contain additional methods, results and limitations.

The 30-second takeaway

Virtual-reality interventions were reported to reduce pain during dialysis-access needle insertion and improve selected physical outcomes and depressive symptoms. These findings concern adults receiving hemodialysis. The abstract does not provide enough detail to determine how large or lasting the changes were, or which comparison conditions underlie the reported improvements.

Keep in mind

The abstract omits effect estimates, confidence intervals and control conditions. The authors call for standardized outcome measurement periods, leaving the timing and durability of reported changes unresolved.

Different technologies were included

Most included studies used virtual reality, while the others used sensor-based exercise games. The review therefore grouped different technologies under its metaverse label. Its reported pooled benefits focused on virtual reality, without describing the interventions' content or implementation.

The outcomes have separate meanings

The review reported changes in needle pain, depressive symptoms, walking performance, physical activity, oxygen saturation and heart rate. These measurements address different questions; physiological changes alone do not demonstrate fewer medical complications or improved overall health.

CHECK THE ORIGINAL

The original publication

Metaverse technology use among patients undergoing hemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Chong HJ, Kim MJ, Raszewski R et al.
Appl Nurs Res · 2025

PubMed ID
40744552
Record checked

AI-assisted research and writing. This explains one selected publication; it is not a complete review of everything known. Our approach.